Monday, April 8, 2013

ESSAY TRES


Tyler Bivona
Dr. Kerr
EN 101-4
8 April 2013
2013 Budget Sequester and the Effects of it

            One of the biggest political headlines of late 2012 and early 2013 was the uncertainty surrounding an impending budget sequestration and its effects on the American public.  The causes were plain enough to see, a lack of funding in the federal budget that would force cuts from virtually every part of the government.  But the effects of these cuts are far more unclear.  The budget sequestration that went into effect in March of 2013 could result in a loss of nearly a million  jobs in 2013 and 2014, would force the government to cut a total of $1.2 trillion from the budget over the next ten years, and on a more local level, would cause massive spending cuts that would affect thousands of people in the state of Maryland.
The sequester is, as described by Matt Smith of CNN, “A series of automatic, across-the-board cuts to government agencies” (Smith).  These cuts were originally supposed to go into effect at the beginning of 2013, but they were put off until March by the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 (Boles), which was passed in the early morning hours on January 1, 2013.  This bill stemmed from Congress’ attempt to avoid the fiscal cliff, which would have brought massive cuts to the government, leading the Department of Defense to have to prepare to notify “All 800,000 of its civilian employees that some of them could be forced into unpaid leave without a deal” (Weisman).  Since the extended deadline passed on March 1st, most of these cuts have gone into effect.
As a result of these cuts, the government has to cut a total of $1.2 trillion from the budgets for the next ten years (Smith).  These cuts are split “50-50 between defense and domestic discretionary spending” (Smith). Since half of these cuts are coming from defense, it creates a wave that can majorly disrupt the entire defense industry.  A total of $46 billion was cut from defense spending in 2013 alone, causing former Defense Secretary Leon Panetta to remark that the cuts would “Cut sharply into military readiness” (Smith) With these cuts comes a lack of money flow into the military industrial complex, so huge companies like Boeing, Lockheed-Martin, and other defense contractors have to furlough employees or even lay them off.  However, not just the defense industry would be hurt by these cuts. 
With these cuts would bring the potential for massive amounts of jobs lost.  According to the Bipartisan Policy Center, the sequester would cost the United States economy nearly one million jobs in fiscal years 2013 and 2014 (Akbas).  While this doesn’t mean that one million people will suddenly find themselves out of work, it does mean that the economy would create a million less jobs than it might otherwise have created if the sequester didn’t go into effect.  Again, this only serves to hurt recovery from the recession that America is still mired in by preventing people access to income, and it continues to hurt the government’s budget, as those million jobless people who might have gotten a job might have to resort to unemployment benefits to get by.
On a less national level, the sequester cuts would have a profound impact on nearly every state, including Maryland.  In the White House’s report on the effects of the sequester for the state of Maryland, these cuts were outlined in detail. Some of these cuts include a loss of $14.4 million in funding for primary and secondary education, and furloughs for nearly 46,000 civilian Department of Defense employees, which would “Reduce gross pay by around $353.7 million in total”(United States).  The $14.4 million in education cuts would put around 200 teachers and aides at risk of losing their jobs, as well as cutting funding to thirty schools in Maryland.  Not only would education be hit hard in Maryland, but other programs, such as environmental protections for clean air and water would lose funding.  The White House states that “Maryland would lose about $3.1 million in environmental funding to ensure clean water and air quality” (United States).  It certainly isn’t just Maryland that is affected by the sequester, every state in the union would suffer some form of funding cuts as a result of the sequester.
The sequester has been one of the most talked-about political issues for the past six months, and with good reason.  The sequester will negatively impact millions of Americans, and might even prove to hamper economic recovery from the recession.  With over a trillion dollars slated to be cut from the federal budgets for the next ten years, and a million jobs potentially being lost in the next two years alone, the sequester is a specter that continues to hang over the United States’ economic recovery.

Wednesday, March 6, 2013

Compare and contrast rough draft


Tyler Bivona
Dr. Kerr
EN101-4
March 6, 2013
            The United States and The United Kingdom have lots of history with each other.  The United States formed from thirteen colonies of England’s, and, ever since World War One, they have been great allies.  Both of these countries act as defenders of democracy across the globe, so it is often interesting to compare how each country runs their own democratic elections.  While both countries’ elections are similar, they also can be very different, especially when it comes to electing a leader.
            One similarity between the United States and the United Kingdom concerns who can vote.  In the United States, as per the Constitution, any US Citizen that is eighteen years of age or older and not in prison can vote.  The 19th amendment, which was ratified in 1920, extended the right to vote to women that were over twenty-one, while the 26th amendment, ratified in 1971, lowered the voting age for everyone to eighteen.  In the United Kingdom, the situation is almost the same.  With the passing of the Representation of the People Act 1983, the right to vote in the United Kingdom was extended to anyone who would be eighteen or over by Election Day.  The United Kingdom allows women the right to vote as well.
            When the actual elections take place in these two countries is an entirely different subject.  The United States holds general elections on the first Tuesday in November every two years for Congress, and every four years for president.  The United Kingdom, however, holds general elections for Parliament every five years.  Interestingly, the actual date of the election is determined by the ruling party of the cycle prior.  That would be like Democrats choosing the date for the 2014 elections since they are the ruling party.  The only time this would change in the UK would be if Parliament were to be dissolved before the five years are up.  This can only be done by the current ruling monarch, which would be nearly unthinkable today. 
            The largest similarity between the voting system in Britain, and the one in the United States, is that voters in both countries directly vote for their legislative bodies.  Parliament and Congress are both bicameral, meaning they have two bodies to the legislature.  In the US, there is the House of Representatives and the Senate.  Parliament has a House of Lords and a House of Commons.  The House of Commons is the only house that is elected in the UK, and voters vote for Ministers of Parliament (MP) to represent their district. The only real difference between an MP and a Representative is that, since the UK doesn’t really have “states” the way the US does, they don’t need to worry that something they vote on might cut funding to their statesmen, just their district. 
            The largest and most noticeable difference is how a head of government is chosen. Head of government, not head of state, as that is the Queen.  In the United States, the president is elected through the Electoral College, which gives each state a number of votes for president based on population.  A candidate needs 270 or more electoral votes to become president.  In the UK, it’s entirely different.  The ruling party in Parliament chooses one of their own to become prime minister for as long as they stay in power, or until they lose confidence in him.   In the UK, people only vote for their MPs, not their chief executive like in America.
            Both the United Kingdom and the United States have contributed to a massive exchange of ideas and practices over their long history together.  Even their elective systems are somewhat similar.  It is to be somewhat expected that such great allies would have very similar ideas when it comes to how the people choose their leaders.    


I know the conclusion is weak, but i'm working on it.

Wednesday, February 6, 2013

Essay one-what I know

I guess I should finally start on this.

What I know for essay one:


  • A life in government can either be entirely in the public eye, or it can be entirely out of it
  • If you want to be something like a senator or representative, you're going to need a lot of money to campaign, even on a state level
  • You don't actually need a law degree to work for the government or as a legislator surprisingly enough
Really that's it, I don't know a whole lot yet. 
10:37 PM Walkersville 

Tuesday, February 5, 2013

Careers I am apparently best suited for.

It's 10:00 on Tuesday night here in walkersville, and I have just finished taking this career quiz.  Somewhat unsurprisingly, my highest matched cluster was government and public administration, with 6 matches.  It's really funny because every single career survey like that has given me the same result.  My second highest cluster was a tie between hospitality (i.e hotels) and then human services.  Oh well.

Wednesday, January 30, 2013


This is me, as you might already be able to tell.  I am big into soccer and football, the main teams that I follow are Manchester United, Seattle Sounders FC, and Palermo.  I follow them each for different reasons.  For football, it's all about the Saints. 


 
Doctor Who and Sherlock are far and away my favorite shows on Television

 
I play video games relatively often, and when I do, most of my time is spent playing FIFA 13 on my PS3.